翻訳と辞書 |
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals : ウィキペディア英語版 | Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals was a Supreme Court opinion denying a petition for motion to proceed ''in forma pauperis'', as the petitioner had repeatedly abused the process. Specifically, the Court prohibited the petitioner from filing further non-criminal ''in forma pauperis'' petitions, and that all petitions filed must be compliant with Court rules and must have had the filing fee paid. The dissent, written by Justice Stevens argued that the result violated the "open access" of the Court.This opinion is frequently used to deny petitions and restrict petitioners even today. ==External links==
*(Opinion from Findlaw )
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|